EXPEDITIONS AND NOTES

1

Dhaulagiri VII (Putha Hiunchuli)

Pete Dronkers

In early April, Blue Eisele, Curtis Gray, and I went to explore the Dhaulagiri range to try a new route on the north side of Churen Himal (7372 m). But first, we needed to cross the Himalaya on foot from south to north. This is perhaps the longest approach in Nepal - about 150 miles and 10,700 m of ups and downs to the Kaya khola valley. We left the road head near Beni with a staff of three and seven donkeys, clearly understanding that we could bypass it all by chartering an aircraft.

On day five we traded our weary donkeys for tougher ones and kept pushing along. In all, we crossed six passes. Three were above 4200 m and had plenty of pre-monsoon snow - into which the donkeys collapsed when they punched through, causing us to shuttle their loads. On day 10 we descended into the arid, Tibet like region of Lower Dolpo, leaving the lush jungles behind us - surprised we had gotten this far.

We followed the Barbung khola to Kakkotgaon and were utterly confused about where to go next - as the Kaya khola was a massive series of waterfalls coming down from unknown origins. We had virtually no information about previous expeditions and had useless maps. We guessed (but still don't know for sure) that only 4-5 expeditions had climbed Churen Himal or Putha Hiunchuli (its western neighbour at 7239 m) from Kakkotgaon. Upon some local advice, we headed to a pass where nothing looked promising. At this point our staff wouldn't continue, the donkeys were gone, and Curtis bailed out of the expedition entirely. Blue and I were left to triple carry our kit in order to progress.

On day 21 we finished our carries along an exposed ridge and placed base camp on grassy fields 600 m above the Kaya khola underneath what we thought was Putha Hiunchuli. We watched the approach to Churen get bombarded from rock fall, and the unclimbed northwest face looked BURLY. So, we started up Putha alpine style. No one was in sight - even our liaison officer had never made it past Kathmandu. When we stood on the summit after an easy two-day push, we saw Putha in the distance and realised we may have accidentally made the first ascent of a peak later referred to as Turka Himal (c. 5791 m).

We rested, then packed for an eight-day push and took a guess as to how to get to the mountain, getting sufficiently lost in the process. At our second camp we saw evidence of others and figured they had passed while we climbed Turka. On day three we met the French expedition. They had chartered a plane and hired a dozen porters, high altitude workers, and a climbing guide. Blue and I passed them with packs on our backs and put a high camp at 6400 m on the east ridge.

Summit day was an agonising blend of pot-holing and total uncertainty, but at 4.45 p.m. we stood atop the highest mountain we'd ever climbed. This may have been the first alpine style ascent of the mountain from the north.

Six days later we reached the Juphal airstrip and took the easy way back to Kathmandu. By then, Blue and I had covered some 250 miles, about 15,000 vertical metres and worked nearly continuously for over 40 days - seeing only two other westerners the entire trip. When we arrived in Thailand, we took a real vacation for a change.

Summary :

The ascent of Putha Hiunchuli (7239 m) in 2008.

2

Ganesh V

Aymeric Clouet

Ganesh V (6770 m) lies at the eastern end of the Ganesh Himal, visible from Kathmandu. The northern flank, technically in Tibet, was climbed by a large Japanese expedition in 1980, and later the south face was climbed by a Slovenian team. Until 2007, these were the only routes on the mountain. Our recent climb established a new route on the mountain.

At 4 p.m. on 15 November, Frederic Degoulet, Julien Dusserre, Mathieu Maynadier and I reached the top of the third point (6741 m by GPS) of Ganesh V, having climbed the east ridge. We named the mountain as 'Gorilla Peak', because we could see the face of a gorilla in the summit rocks when looking from the east.

Our route from base camp was 6.5 km long, with a vertical interval of2700 m (1240 m of technical ridge climbing) Difficulties encountered included 3-4 km of cornices, 75° snow mixed climbing to M5 and Rock to 6a.

After a 15-day acclimatisation trek along the paths of Gosainkund lake (the sacred lake of Shiva), we met our team of 10 porters and cooks in the village of Tatopani. It was the last village we would see for 23 days. Our acclimatisation was uneventful, other than our change in diet to dal bhat (rice and dal), traditional Nepalese food that caused intestinal problems. Following a pattern of three days at altitude, then three days rest, we established our advanced base camp at 5500m, sheltered by a small cliff.

Our first bivouac was at 6200 m, where we left a cache of bivouac equipment, food and gear.

After one final rest at base camp we decided to sail to sea and try for the summit.

The expression is fitting, as a marvellous sea of clouds accompanied us, as though we were sailing on an ocean of cotton. However, these clouds eventually began to change into wet cumulus, dropping snowflakes in the afternoon. The change in weather forced us to adapt, as the climbing became more mixed and was swept by small snow slides.

Sometimes we had to stop for a few hours to wait for a clearing, in order to get oriented. On the evening of the fourth day, when we bivouacked at c. 6500 m, we were informed that 100km/hour winds were forecasted for the following day till evening. The temperature was already low, each night dropping to -20° or -25°C, and we realised that further drop would prove unbearable.

Knowing that we would not have a second chance, we set our hearts on the most easterly of the three summits of Ganesh V. This was the rockiest and in our opinion the most beautiful.

On the fifth day we climbed 250 m of granite (mixed and 6a) to the top, about 30 m lower than the main summit.

The forecast allowed enough time for a quick descent, and the immense joy of successfully reaching the top made us forget, during the bivouac that followed, the cold and the fear of being ripped off the wall by the wind. It was late on the sixth night that we reached base camp, where we were greeted warmly by Kamal and Rai, our cooks, who were happy to join in our celebrations.

Summary :

An ascent of Ganesh V by new route, on 15 November 2008

3

Slovenian Expedition to NE Nepal, 2008

Tone Skarja (Translated by Miha Valic)

At the end of September, the Slovenian Alpine Association organised an expedition to the Kangchenjunga area in remote northeastern Nepal. Six alpinists -Tine Cuder, Matej Kladnik, Ales Kozelj, Boris Lorencic, Mitja Sorn and Miha Valic- were chosen as a team led by Tone Skarja, a leader with great experience in the Himalaya. Damijan Mesko was the expedition's doctor.

The main goal of the expedition was Kangbachen (7902 m), the fifth highest peak of the Kangchenjunga massif. But because of broken moraine on the Ramtang glacier, the base camp couldn't be reached with porters, so the team decided to set up base camp on the Pangpema plateau and chose new goals from there.

Ales Kozelj and Mitja Sorn made their acclimatisation ascent close to the south pillar of the middle peak of Drohmo. They reached the ridge in two days and joined the previously known route (Doug Scott and Roger Mear in 1999) in a few places. Like the previous party, they too failed to reach the main summit (6886 m) and only ascended to the secondary summit in the Drohmo ridge - 6855 m. They reported to have climbed difficulties up to 80760°, 800 m. They had good snow conditions so they could descend via an alternative route.

After an unsuccessful attempt of the north face of Wedge peak and Kiratchuli, Ales Kozelj, Tine Cuder and Matej Kladnik tried once again the south face of Drohmo. Mitja Sorn had to stay in base camp because of a toothache. They spent the night at the foot of the wall and on the next day in eight hours, climbed a new route to the East peak that has probably never been climbed before. They had relatively good conditions and descended to the base camp on the same day. Difficulties on the 900m long route 'Smrdljiva sled' (Stinking trail) were estimated around TD+, VI/4+, M4.

Boris Lorencic and Miha Valic acclimatised themselves at the Pangpema Peak (6068 m) and then made a first ascent of the unnamed Peak 6630 m on the Pathibara southeast ridge. The steepness of the snowy slopes they had climbed reached 45°. After three days they returned to the base camp well acclimatised, although they couldn't examine the southwest face of Pathibara - Pyramid peak (7140 m), because the weather became very cloudy every afternoon.

After a few days of rest, the weather stabilised enough and they set out for the remote basin under the southwest face of Pathibara that has not been climbed before. On the next day they climbed to the glacier plateau under the wall and examined the imagined route. They spent the night at an altitude of 5900 m. On the first day they climbed 50-60° steep snowy slopes. They spent the night on a narrow shelf under the rocky band (IV, 20 m) at 6900 m and reached the summit on the next morning. This was a first ascent of Pathibara from Nepal and probably the second ever ascent of the main peak (a Korean-Japanese expedition in 1993 first ascended it from Sikkim). They descended via the same route and returned to the base camp after five days. The walking on broken glaciers was very strenuous, but the weather and climbing conditions were really good.

Summary :

Ascents in northeast Nepal on Drohmo, Pangpema and Pathibara in 2008.

Drohmo V. Route of ascent. (Cuder)

Drohmo V. Route of ascent. (Cuder)



The south pillar of Drohmo, with the new Slovenian line in red, their descent route in green. The 1998 British route was to the left of the Slovene route. (Mitja Sorn)

The south pillar of Drohmo, with the new Slovenian line in red, their descent route in green. The 1998 British route was to the left of the Slovene route. (Mitja Sorn)



Drohmo, close up. (Kozelj)

Drohmo, close up. (Kozelj)



The southwest face of Pathibhara with the Loren and Valic line marked. They made the first ascent of the peak from Nepal and probably the second overall. (Miha Valic)

The southwest face of Pathibhara with the Loren and Valic line marked. They made the first ascent of the peak from Nepal and probably the second overall. (Miha Valic)



Drohmo peaks. Main on left and Peak V with route marked. (Cuder)

Drohmo peaks. Main on left and Peak V with route marked. (Cuder)



4

Damodar Himal, 2008

Paulo Grobel

WHEN YOU COME back home from an expedition to Nepal, often you are asked just one question: 'Summit or no Summit?'.

You then realise how difficult it is to express the many facets of this life so far away from our normal lives. All the delights and difficulties encountered along the way, sometimes so far from the images associated with alpinism.

And when our interrogator dares ask about the summits we climbed, what disappointment when the summit's altitude was laughable and its name unheard of.

There is a look of incomprehension... why travel so far to climb insignificant peaks that nobody knows?

Summits climbed north of Saribung pass. Camp 2 was on snow col on right.

Summits climbed north of Saribung pass. Camp 2 was on snow col on right.



What can you say? Apart from putting the question the other way round... 'why climb only the big summits; that have no surprises, that everybody knows?'

What appeals to me in the Damodar 2008 expedition is precisely this particular kind of mountaineering; of discovery and exploration.

What I like is to set off without knowing where I am going, with infinite horizons ahead. What I like is to share these special emotions and encourage other alpinists to dare step out of line.

'Mustang Phu' is an incredible trail, somewhere between mountaineering and hiking, accumulating nuggets of simple joys.

In Autumn 2008, we wanted to experience the pure delight offered by this stunningly beautiful trail once again, taking the time to improve our knowledge of the Damodar Himal.

Peaks around Saribung pass.

Peaks around Saribung pass.



It is a tiny mountain range, almost insignificant, interspersed between the kingdom of Mustang and the valley of Phu. And I very much love these mysterious in-betweens.. !

What will we tell them when we come back?

That 'Mustang Phu' really is the extraordinary journey that, last year, we had but a glimpse of.

That it is exhilarating to cross the kingdom of Mustang, treading in sacred footsteps, listening to the spirit of Ringzum Gonpo, Sago Namgo and the 'spirit catchers'.

That our delight in these mountains was crowned with some great achievements on these ridiculous summits.

• On 11 October 2008, Marie-Christine Cler and Paulo Grobel climbed Sonam Himal and Karsang Peak, 'Mary's bosses', 6225 m, the two small summits north of Saribung pass - easy panoramic ascent, grading II/F snow.

• On 13 October 2008, 'Le Belvedere d'Alfred' (Alfred's viewpoint) 6226 m, a summit in the centre of the Damodar glacier was summitted by Vincent Stellato, Pascal Pueyo, Jean Milteau and Paulo Grobel (the eastern ridge, grading II/PD snow).

Kumlun (6365 m). Route of ascent on left, named ‘Honorez la vie....’

Kumlun (6365 m). Route of ascent on left, named ‘Honorez la vie....’



• On 14 October 2008, the Kumlun, 6365 m, north of the De Hults pass was climbed by Paul Vulin and Paulo Grobel. Route was named: 'Honorez la vie'...(Honour life), grading II/D, snow, starting from the west slope of the pass at 6273 m, pursuing on the south slope of the northwestern ridge.

We thus confirmed that this was the ideal route for the crossing from Mustang to Phu with the ascent of the Saribung peak.

But we also perceived the extreme fragility of these remote territories characterised by wilderness. They deserve to be approached with awareness and respect, which is a form of excellence in the practice of mountaineering.

And, inevitably, I will go back there to initiate another Mustang Phu, to play once more at mountain and frontier hopping for the sake of this incredible trail.

See: http://www.paulogrobel.com/05_expes/Fiches_PDF/cr_ mustan2phuZcr_M2P_asc.htm for pictures and text (in French)

Summary :

Explorations and climbs in the Damodar Himal of Nepal.

5

Kanjiroba, 2008

Paulo Grobel

This was an expedition with an unexpected denouement. We managed to reach neither the base camp at the heart of the massif, nor, of course, Patrasi Himal, our main objective. We had been short of 200 m of rope to get over the steep, snow-covered pass, which would have enabled us to reach the valley of Jagdula khola. Our equipment which had travelled 'by land' had still not arrived. Nevertheless, we did a good job!

Access to the base camp of Kanjiroba now poses less of a problem - it is no longer necessary to go up 'impassable' gorges. In fact, we took a new route, which we named the 'Honeymoon trail' in remembrance of the epic adventure of a team of young British Alpinists and Alison and Tom Wedgwood who were on their honeymoon. A touching story....

No need to mention that 'the hard part of Kanjiroba is the approach' any more. As peace has come back to Nepal, it is high time we got interested in the as yet unfrequented mountain range.

Having been unable to attain the Patrasi, we concentrated on the southern part of the massif first visited in 1953 by Herbert Tichy with the first ascent of the 6045 m high Dudh Kundali. Tichy had named it Dui Tal Chuli, curiously translated as : the celestial torch between the two lakes.

Jagdula tal.

Jagdula tal.



On 11 and 12 November, we went across the southern ridge of the Dudh Kundali and named it 'a torch for Tibet', grade III/AD+ with snow.

Michelle Quatrini, Philippe Wagner, Yveline Gobil, Victor Lapras, Hugues De Varax, Chhotemba Sherpa and Paulo Grobel were the climbers. The passage could be compared with the Rochefort ridge in the Mont Blanc range. We used Alpine technique, without a fixed rope.

On 13 November, we succeeded in crossing the Dudh Kundali (Jean Berthet and Paulo Grobel). Ascent was from the south ridge and descent from the 'bumpy ridge', the western ridge, to Lake Jagdula. The traverse is a form of Alpinism that is very rarely practised in the Himalaya, which is a pity. It is such a great pleasure to walk along a beautiful ridge beneath blue skies.

Then, at the end of our stay, to complete our knowledge of the massif, we opened an Alpine hiking tour from lake Jagdula to Jumla via Lubdu valley and the village of Chotra.

We crossed a big glaciated pass at 5488 m, the Tichy pass, and, on the way, succeeded in climbing a small snow-covered peak at 5518 m.

Kanjiroba main peak.

Kanjiroba main peak.



Kasi Dalpha (6386 m).

Kasi Dalpha (6386 m).



To conclude : This expedition confirmed the particular appeal of the Kanjiroba massif. At the height of the tourist season, we did not meet a single expedition. And above all, the inhabitants of Hurikot were the most gracious of hosts.

It is important to go ahead and step out of line. Not only because of the tremendous pleasure, but principally because the political and social benefits are so important for the future of Nepal. In these regions where poverty is widespread and tourists are rare, the economic impact of an expedition is of real importance. It is a way of making our activity as Alpinists count. Our presence this far west, outside the realms of trendy travel, allows a more efficient distribution of the economic effects of tourism in the interior of the country. This is one more reason to make the mountains of western Nepal better known.

Summary :

Explorations and climbs around in the less frequented area around Kanjiroba in the western Nepal.

Additional information can be found on the website

http://www.paulo-grobel.com/05_expes/Fiches_PDF/cr_ kanjiroba7cr_kanjiroba_2cb.htm

6

Two First Ascents in Geladaindong Massif of Tanggla Shan

The headwaters of the true source of the Yangtze River

Tamotsu Nakamua

The snowy massif of Geladaindong of the Tanggla Shan is 50 km long north to south and 20 km wide west to east, covering a circumference of 670 square kilometres with ice and snow engulfed by more than 40 glaciers. Thawing glaciers combine to form many rivulets which converge into large expanse of swamps with lakes and foster the source of the Yangtze river (Chang Jiang).

Lying in the Amdo County of Qinghai Province which is in the middle section of Tanggla Shan, the 6621 m Geladaindong is located at 90°E and 33.5°N and circled by more than 20 high peaks exceeding 6000 m. Being the fringe of the ancient Mediterranean (Sea) in Tertiary Period, it began to rise sharply later on and was not shaped as what looks now until the end of the Quaternary Period (some 15,000 years ago).

An early French explorer and traveller, Gabriel Bonvalot, described the mountains in the source of the Yangtze river (Chang Jiang) in his narrative of the journey (1889 - 1890) where he traversed deep Central Asia north to south - De Paris au Tonking a Travers le Tibet inconnu, 1891 (Across Thibet, 1892,English translation).

January 14 - We encamp at the foot of the pass which we shall have to scale in order to cross an enormous chain of mountains, which we name after that distinguished Frenchman Dupleix (the original French edition states nous donnos un des plus beaux noms de France : nous I'appelouns chaine Dupleix), We are at a greater altitude than ever, some of the peaks beside our camp being at least 20,000 feet high.

January 15 - We cross a pass at about 16,500 feet, following a gentle slope, and to the west see the glaciers extending down to a valley, which we shall follow, marching over ice. In the mist we catch a glimpse of snowy peaks, which we calculate to be at least 26,000 feet high, and throughout the whole of this region there is a multiplicity of small lakes and pools. The hills, the soil of which is very friable, bear traces of melting of the snows and of the inundations which follow, and there is abundance of ice.

January 16 - As we march over the frozen river, deep and broad, and its surface so slippery that our men can hardly keep their feet, we cannot help thinking that the Dupleix Mountains must be the origin of a great river, or at all events, one of its principal sources. It is, of course, impossible to say positively, but my belief is that we are at the sources of the Yang-tse-Kiang.

The Dupleix mountains are Geladaindong massif. As his diary suggests, Gabriel Bonvalot had already found Geladaindong massif more than 100 years ago and recognised the source of the Yangtze river. However the mountains region remained unknown for a century, and to enter the least-known mountains and river sources, we had to await the open-door policy of new China launched by Deng Shaopin in late 1970s.

The forerunner which first began as an exploration of unfrequented Geladaindong massif in the true source of the Yangtse river and an attempt on climbing the major peaks including the highest summit Geladaindong 6621 m was a Japanese party. They began negotiation with the China Mountaineering Association in 1982 to obtain a permit to have access to and reconnoiter the region, and succeeded in the first ascent of Geladaindong, the highest peak in the massif, in 1985. 22 years later, unnamed Peak 6543 m, a sister peak of Geladaindong was first scaled by another Japanese party in 2007.

6543 m peak - east face (Tottori party)

6543 m peak - east face (Tottori party)



Geladaindong (6621 m) in 1985

The society of Mountaineering Research on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the Kyoto University Exploration Club challenged the Geladaindong massif in 1985. Their objective was to climb three major peaks of the Geladaindong massif - Geladaindong (6621 m), Jianggendiru (6564 m) and Gaqiadiru (6513 m) of the Tanggla Shan; to explore the true source of the Yangtze river and to conduct Japan-China joint geologic research.

Japanese members :

- Leader - Prof. Yukio Matsumoto (56), two deputy-leaders - Prof. Tamio Nishida (42) and Prof. Masatake Matsubara (43), 12 members (22 - 43) and five media reporters (27 - 47)

Chinese members :

Three members from Geologic Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, two liaison officers, two interpreters, three cooks and 11 drivers

Approach

On 25 July, all the members departed from Xining in ten Nissan patrols and one truck carrying 4.5 tons of gear and supplies. Passing by the southern bank of the Lake Qinghai, on the following day they arrived at Golmud in the Qaidam basin. They spent a couple of days for acclimatising themselves to high altitude at about 5000 m near the Kunlun pass.

On 1 August they moved to Toutouheyan (4533 m, called Tanggla too) from Golmud driving through the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. They stayed three days to make necessary preparations. On 5 August, all the members resumed their caravan to march towards the destination. At Yangxiping they left the Qinghai-Tibet Highway and entered a mountain track to the west. On the way the Nissan patrols were stuck in a marshy ground. Passing a high pass they reached a river bank of the Changkung Qu, where Geladaindong, which means 'a mountain soaring sharply to the sky', came into sight. The vehicles again stopped mid stream of the Changkung Qu, but they could manage a narrow escape pulling them out from water and camped nearby.

On 6 August after crossing several small streams, they set up base camp at 5280 m in a river bank of the Gar Qu. There were many blue poppies and edelweiss there. After serious discussion, they decided to choose the northwest ridge as a climbing route to the summit from a glacier in the headwaters of the Gar Qu.

Geladaindong main summit 6621 m - north face

Geladaindong main summit 6621 m - north face



Climbing

On 11 August, they ascended side moraine on the right bank of the glacier and then entered the glacier. C1 was at 5680 m on the eastern side moraine on the glacier right beneath the east ridge.

On 12 August, K. Kurachi and two other members ascended an ice plateau with many crevasses on the upper glacier traversing upwards from east to west and chose a place for C2 at 6100 m just below a col between Geladaindong and a nameless peak of 6293 m on the northwest ridge. C3 was set up on 13 August. The following day was bad weather and no route paving and load ferrying was possible but 10 members came to C2, seven members at C1 and the remaining members stayed at BC.

On 15 August, Kurachi and three other members departed from C2 for the summit attempt. They followed the northwest ridge, which had an enormous cornice on the left having a sheer drop straightly to the Geladaindong glacier. When they overcame the spur and reached a snow plateau, there was a snow storm. They waited two hours expecting the fog to fade out, but the condition of whiteout did not change. They bivouacked in a snow cave hoping for good weather on the following day. On 16 August, as the whiteout continued, they descended to C2. On 18 August, two members made the second ascent of peak 6293 m north of the main summit which had been first climbed by the other six members on 15 August.

On 19 August, six members headed by Kurachi left C2 at 7:20 a.m. and followed paved pitches to trace the three rock spurs digging out fixed ropes buried in fresh snow. At 1:30 p.m. they reached snow plateau leading to the summit. The plateau continued to the summit about 100 m higher. All the six members stood atop Geladaindong at 3:06 p.m.

A brief supplementary report by Lindsay Griffin on a climbing chronicle of the Geladaindong.

After the successful Japanese ascent of the northwest ridge in 1985, there is no confirmed report of an ascent of Geladaindong until 1994, when the route was repeated by an expedition from the Beijing University Mountaineering Club. This was billed as the first Chinese ascent of the mountain, but the names of the summiteers have not been identified.

The peak was visited again in 1997 by a small American party; Dan Luchtel and William Rom, guided by Mark Newcomb. These three approached the mountain from the same direction as the previous two expeditions and found evidence of the 1994 visit both at base camp and higher on the mountain. On the 5 September, while the other two climbers were resting, Newcomb carried equipment to the proposed site of Camp 1 and then continued to the foot of the northeast face at 5800 m. He then soloed a line directly up the snow/ice face above and into a couloir at c. 6300m. The steepest part of the couloir and the crux of the climb was a short section of 55-60° ice. He exited more or less onto the sharp summit and down-climbed the northwest ridge. On 7 September, all three climbers spent the night at the c. 6100 m col at the start of the northwest ridge and the following day reached the summit for the fourth overall ascent of the mountain. The Americans reported the ridge to be technically straightforward, so it seems likely to have been climbed subsequently by Chinese mountaineers.

Unnamed 6543 m peak in 2007

A local party from Tottori Prefecture in Japan succeeded in the first ascent of an unnamed peak 6543 m, one of the major peaks in Geladaindong massif. The 6543 m peak is 5.4 km southwest of Geladaindong in the headwaters of the Gangjiaquba glacier. The team was called the China Qinghai-Tibet Friendship Mountaineering Expedition. They stood on the summit on October 2.

Members : Japanese : Yoshiharu Murakami, (65) leader, Eishi Sato (65), deputy leader, Osamu Kato (59) climbing leader and two members Tamiyoshi Hashimoto (50) and Mizuho Sato (65). Chinese : Qiao Haisheng.

Climbing

They took their climbing route on the Gangjiaquba glacier with no crevasses south of the main peak of Geladaindong 6621m. On 2 October Osamu Kato, Yoshiharu Murakami and Tamiyoshi Hashimoto began ascending from C2 at 7:00 a.m. while it was still dark. Strong winds were prevailing above the C2. At 6100m Murakami gave up climbing and the other two ascended to a col at 6200m. There was wide and gentle slope of snow plateau in the western side of the col that shared watershed and headwaters of the source of the Yangtze river. Because of strong winds on the northwest ridge, they entered the south ridge side to the right but Hashimoto was exhausted and resigned from further progress. Then Kato soloed and reached the top at 3:25 p.m. They returned to C2 at 6:50 p.m. and further descended to C1 at 8:30 p.m. On the following day, they gathered at the BC.

Summary:

Two first ascents in Geladaindong massif of Tanggla Shan.

7

Dingjung Ri, 2007 and 2008

Tsunemichi Ikeda

Attempt in 2007

A three-member Kanseigakuin University expedition, led by Kenro Nakajima, made the first authorised attempt on the East Ridge of Dingjung Ri (6196 m) in March, 2007. Mayuko Demoto (f), Naoki Tanaka and the leader Nakajima approached the trekking route toward the Nangpa la via Thame and established base camp on the Menlung Glacier at 4950 m on 3 March.

They fixed 500 m of rope on the southeast flank of the East ridge after setting up a high camp at 5435 m. On 12 March, the three made a summit bid which ended at a high point of 6000 m. Six days later, on 18th, Demoto and Nakajima made another attempt. They reached at 6132 m but exhaustion and the lack of fixed rope for a difficult traverse section caused them to retreat.

The First Ascent in 2008

Nakajima returned to the mountain again in March, 2008 with Hiroki Yamamoto and succeeded in the first ascent. They established base camp on 7 March at the same place as 2007. It was a vast snowfield a year before. This year, there was no snow but comfortable meadows. The mountain also had less snow and ice.

They set up a high camp at the foot of the route on 8th. Climbing on the flank with little snow, was disturbed by occasional falling stones but they fixed 300 m of rope and emerged onto the east ridge. They launched their summit bid from a high camp on 15 th and gained the highest point of the previous year two hours earlier than expected. They had to climb over a false summit and a knife-edged snow ridge in the final part of the route.

It was 11:30 a.m. when they got to the virgin summit. Rising clouds forced them to descend and they reached the high camp in only four hours, at 3:30 p.m. There was still enough time to continue descent to base camp. They evacuated camp and with over 30 kgs of load on their back, they reached base camp in the dark. Exhausted and hungry after 16 hours of struggle, they were warmly welcomed by the Nepalese staff at base camp.

Dingjung Ri South

Dingjung Ri South



Summary :

Dinjung Ri (6196 m), Rolwaling Himal, Nepal - the first ascent by the east ridge, 7-16 March 2008, by Kenro Nakajima and Hiroki Yamamoto.

Additional Notes by Lindsay Griffin, Editor Climb magazine.

A little to the north of Pt. 6196 m, Dingjung Ri (6249 m) lies on the border south of 6625 m Panbuk Ri (and a little north of the Menlung La) and has no known recent ascent. But there is a certain ambiguity when it comes to the naming of both Pt. 6249 m and Pt. 6196 m. On the new list of permitted peaks announced in 2002, Pt. 6249 m, as designated on the HMG-FINN map, was called Dingjung Ri. In fact neither 6249 m nor 6196 m are named on this map.

The old Schneider's Rolwaling map has the heights of these peaks as 6320 m and 6249 m respectively, naming the latter (Pt. 6196 m on the FINN map) Dingjung Ri. This is repeated on the Japanese maps to the area, and the Japanese climbers mentioned above certainly refer, not illogically, to Pt. 6196 m as Dingjung Ri. It is unlikely that the authorities know which is the true Dingjung Ri though, Pt. 6196 m might be best described as 'Dingjung Ri South'.

Pt. 6249 m was actually first climbed as long ago as 1955 during Alf Gregory's very productive Merseyside Himalayan expedition, which climbed many peaks in the Rolwaling region and made a reconnaissance of Gauri Shankar. Peter Boultbee and Denis Davis, who crossed the Menlung la west into Tibet and made an ascent of Ripimo Shar (6647 m) from the north, also moved north up the Menlung valley and climbed Dingjung Ri from the west.

They were barred from reaching the summit of this then unnamed peak by an enormous crevasse, over which they were forced to execute a big jump. As Kang appears in so many peak names, they felt it apt to name the peak after one of the world's great jumpers, the Kangaroo, and called the peak Kangkuru, a moniker that stuck for many years (and appears as such on the Japanese maps).

8

Thalay Sagar Expedition, 2008

Basanta Singha Roy

Though Thalay Sagar had been climbed by expeditions from various nations no Indian team had yet made an ascent. With the aim of being the first successful Indian team we organised an expedition to this mighty peak. We hired 29 porters at Uttarkashi to carry our loads from Gangotri to the base camp i.e. Kedar tal. The trek started from Gangotri (3139 m) on 15 August 2008 towards south. Transit camp was established on the true left bank of Kedar ganga in between Bhojkharak and Kedarkharak at 4270 m. On 16 August base camp was established on the bank of Kedartal (4668 m).

From base camp to Camp 1, the route leads towards south. We stayed at base camp on 17 August for rest, acclimatisation, rearrangement of our ration and getting our equipment ready. For the next two days we carried loads to Camp 1. We proceeded through the lateral moraine ridge. After trekking for about an hour and half over the moraine ridge, we entered onto a glacier. Then we proceeded again over a boulder zone. Ajay Bhattacharjee, Subrata Brahma Biswanath Saha and myself, along with four Sherpas and a cook occupied Camp 1 (4877 m) below Bhrigupanth peak on 20 August.

The first one and half hour trekking ahead to Camp 2 was through the lateral moraine towards south. It was an easy walk over the boulders. Another one and half hour trekking was upwards through the northern rocky slopes of Thalay Sagar. We took three hours to reach Camp 2 and two hours to return. on the next day we were confined to Camp 1 due to bad weather. On 23 August, four Sherpas and I occupied Camp 2 (5334 m). Subrata and Biswanath, who returned to Camp 1 after escorting Ajay to base camp, also occupied Camp 2 the next day. It was situated at the junction of the north slope of ice and rock of Thalay Sagar. From there we got clear views of the Jogin group of peaks towards the west and base camp area towards north.

Route to Camp 3, summit camp, was through ice, snow and rock wall and along the route, we fixed about 1220 m of polypropylene rope. First we climbed up an ice wall and entered into a crevasse zone towards south. Then we moved towards southwest on a snowfield. After proceeding over the snowfield, we started climbing the north wall of Thalay Sagar, fixing ropes all along. Gradient was about 60o to 70o. Due to huge crevasses, we could not climb quickly and we had to climb up to the bottom of rock wall of Thalay Sagar avoiding them. For ensuring our safety from avalanches from the hanging icefall of the west ridge, which connects Jogin group of peaks and Thalay Sagar, we avoided an easy high gradient snow gully to reach Camp 3. We preferred to climb the difficult rock wall of the snow gully instead.

Thalay Sagar, route of ascent. (Subrata Brahma)

Thalay Sagar, route of ascent. (Subrata Brahma)



Thalay Sagar from Camp 2. (Subrata Brahma)

Thalay Sagar from Camp 2. (Subrata Brahma)



Looking northeast en route to the summit : Bhrigupanth (foreground), behind Chirbas and Matri peaks. (Basanta Singha Roy).

Looking northeast en route to the summit : Bhrigupanth (foreground), behind Chirbas and Matri peaks. (Basanta Singha Roy).



On the summit of Thalay Sagar looking south- Kedar Dome, Kedarnath, Bhatrekhunta and Kirti Stambh peaks. (Basanta Singha Roy)

On the summit of Thalay Sagar looking south- Kedar Dome, Kedarnath, Bhatrekhunta and Kirti Stambh peaks. (Basanta Singha Roy)



We took three days to fix ropes till Camp 3 (6400 m). We also ferried loads simultaneously while fixing ropes. 27 August, 2008 was our rest day. From Camp 2, we traversed the bottom of the vertical north rock wall towards southwest and after climbing up 500 m, we turned towards south. From there the route was mixed with rocks, ice and snow. Rock pitons and snow stakes were used. We found many old ropes on this route. We took nine hours to reach and occupy the summit camp. It was established on a snow slope and on the junction of snowy west ridge which connects the Jogin group of peaks and the vertical rock wall of Thalay Sagar. We pitched two tents on a vast snow slope. When we reached the summit camp, high-speed winds were blowing.

On 29 August, we started at 8.00 a.m. for opening the route to the summit. After climbing 65 m over the snow slope towards east, we faced the vertical rock wall. We tried to avoid the vertical rock wall and found a route at the bottom of the rock wall. Sometimes we managed to avoid the wall by traversing. We started fixing ropes on that rock wall. It took five hours to fix 150 m of climbing ropes. We feared the highspeed wind, which we had had to face previous day. So we returned to the summit camp at 2.00 p.m. but there was no wind.

Next day in two hours we reached the previous day's position and then we started climbing up a snowy ridge. It was an easy climb but more risky. On both sides of the ridge were sheer drops. Again we started traversing at the bottom of the vertical wall of Thalay Sagar. Now we faced a vertical wall, which is about 30 m. It was very difficult and risky to fix ropes on this wall but Sherpas managed to do so through a chimney like crack and after fixing total 400 m climbing ropes throughout the whole day, we returned to summit camp at 6.00 p.m. That day also, we did not face any high speed wind in the camp.

We had already fixed about 550 m rope from summit camp to last rock wall of Thalay Sagar. Only 100 m snow wall was left. So we planned to ascend Thalay Sagar next day i.e. on 31 August. But it began to snow at night and continued till morning so we could not proceed for the summit on 31 August but were forced to stay in tents due to bad weather.

On 1 September, 2008 Pasang Sherpa, Pemba Sherpa, Phurba Gyalgen and myself, prepared ourselves for the Thalay Sagar summit attempt at 3.00 a.m. We were worried that the weather would obstruct our plan to reach the summit. The rope was already fixed, so we had an idea about the probable time it would take to summit so we started at 4.10 a.m. At that time weather was good but too cold and dark. First we started climbing towards east over the snow slope and then we tied ourselves on the fixed rope and started difficult climbing with the help of Jumars.

After an hour of climbing, we viewed the morning sun rays on Kedarnath and Bhartekhunta peaks towards south. Down below, we could see our summit camp on the snowy ridge. Towards west were the peaks of Gangotri group and Jogin group and towards northeast, was Bhrigupanth, so close, it seemed that we could touch the peak from that point. Darkness prevented a view of base camp or Kedartal towards north. For the next hour we were busy photographing and climbing over the sharp snowy ridge or traversing rock walls. At 7.00 a.m. we reached the top of last vertical rock wall of Thalay Sagar. Up to this point we had fixed ropes. Then there was just low gradient snow slope which we started climbing. From there we could clearly see our base camp i.e. Kedartal and as I noticed the sunrays, I knew that it was 7.40 a.m. as this was the moment sunlight touched our base camp. After 10 minutes we reached the top of Thalay Sagar (6904 m).

The top of Thalay Sagar was a semi circle. The north side is corniced and the other three sides are snow slopes. We stayed for an hour and half on the top, taking pictures and identifying peaks as the weather was clear. We started climbing down at 9.20 a.m. and reached summit camp at 11.50 a.m. where Tashi Sherpa greeted us with hot drinks . We were able to take back all climbing ropes except pitons and some karabiners. .

On 03 September, we repacked our loads and left base camp and reached Gangotri in the evening on the same day.

Summary :

Ascent of Thalay Sagar by an Indian team from West Bengal.

9

The North Face Direct of Kalanka

Yusuke Sato

Kalanka (6931m) is one of the peaks which is located on the outer rim of the Nanda Devi sanctuary and lies just east of Changabang. The first ascent of the mountain was made by Ikuo Tanabe's four-member Kamiichi-Hosokai expedition from Japan in 1975. They approached the Rishi Ganga gorge, crossed over Shipton's col to gain the col between Changabang and Kalanka and climbed the west ridge. The summit was reached by Noriaki Ikeda, Tsuneo Kouma, Kazumasa Inoue and the leader Tanabe on 3 June. The first ascent of the north face was made two years later when the 14-member Czechoslovak expedition, led by Frantisek Grunt, climbed to the col by the Bagini glacier and repeated the west ridge. Jozef Raconcaj and Ladislav Jon reached the summit on 20 September.

The north face direct had been attempted several times; in fact, recently by the world's strongest climbers but had still remained unclimbed. Fumitaka Ichimura, Kazuaki Amano and myself, of Giri- Giri Boys, succeeded in making the first ascent of the route in alpine style in autumn, 2008. It took us 11 days (round trip) from base camp including three days of sitting out of snow storms higher on the face.

I was lying in a damp sleeping bag and had eaten only 20 gm of mashed potatoes. We were pinned down for three days by the snow storm at the 6600 m bivouac site that we called 'Hotel Kalanka'. We had been short of fuel and foods for five days. Altitude, low temperatures, exhaustion and poor provisions had weakened us but we still held up through these hardships. We saw a small patch of blue sky in the evening. Maybe tomorrow, we would be able to resume our climbing. Next morning, with snow still falling lightly, we launched our summit bid, on the remaining 300 m of the face.

The north faces of Kalanka (left) and Changabang (right). The Japanese route is marked by a solid line with bivouacs marked with small circles. The 1977 Czechoslovak route takes the line to the right to gain the col between Changabang and Kalanka and followed the west ridge (sky line).

The north faces of Kalanka (left) and Changabang (right). The Japanese route is marked by a solid line with bivouacs marked with small circles. The 1977 Czechoslovak route takes the line to the right to gain the col between Changabang and Kalanka and followed the west ridge (sky line).



As we couldn't find any suitable slopes around our base camp, we had to acclimatise on an unnamed 5800 m peak to the south of Saf Minal. I had worried about my condition after the acclimatisation period. I hadn't been sure of my strength as I suffered various symptoms of high altitude sickness on the upper slopes. But I managed to overcome the uneasiness, keeping in mind our purpose - the north face of Kalanka.

We left base camp with a 30 kg sack on each back and reached ABC at 5100 m on 14 September. The north face still looked severe but I felt we would not be totally rejected by the face. Next day, on 15 th, our first day on the face, we went by a roundabout route to the left as the lower slabs were covered with unstable snow. We climbed cautiously on mixed terrain with poor protection. As we couldn't find any suitable ledge, we dug a tiny ledge on the snow spur at 6000 m, as late as 9:00 p.m.

Next day, we made a long traverse to the right to gain the direct line to the summit. We couldn't take enough time to rest, eat and hydrate as the route was very demanding. The night was spent sitting on a tiny 50 cm ledge at 6100 m.

On the third day, we were on the mixed terrain which we thought was the crux of our route. It began snowing and climbing became a fight against frequent snow showers which caused us to climb in minimum visibility. By nightfall, we dug a ledge for our small tent at 6550 m and fell asleep at 1:00 a.m. on the 18th.

We woke at 4:00 a.m. but were forced to wait until 8:30 by falling snow. After one and a half pitches of climbing we found a terrace better than the previous night and set our small tent there. We called it 'Hotel Kalanka'. We were imprisoned here for the next three days by snow storms.

On the eighth day (22nd), we awoke before dawn but the continuous snowfall forced us to stay inside our damp sleeping bags. We started our summit bid at 9:00 a.m., finding the snowfall lighter. We gained only 150 m in a gully of deep snow after a four-hour struggle. We realised how weakened we were. We reduced our gear to speed up our climbing. With only a thermos and a waist bag, we dashed across the last 150 m of the face and reached the summit after three hours, at 6:00 p.m.

We rappelled in a hurry with head lamps to the bivouac and reached there at 10:00 p.m. to spend our fourth night at 'Hotel Kalanka' without any food. We gained ABC next day and ate and drank our fill. We saw the light in our base camp through mist and darkness. It was the end of our long trip on the formidable north face of the mountain.

Summary :

Kalanka (6931 m), Garhwal Himalaya, India. The first ascent of the direct route on the north face called 'Bushido' (1800 m, M5+) in alpine style, 14-24 September 2008, Fumitaka Ichimura, Kazuaki Amano and Yusuke Sato.

10

The First Ascent of the Southeast Face of Kamet

Kazuya Hiraide and Kei Taniguchi

Kamet (7756 m) is the second highest mountain in the Garhwal Himalaya of India after Nanda Devi. It was first climbed in 1931 by Frank Smythe's British expedition via the Purvi (East) Kamet glacier, the Meade's Col and the northeast ridge. It was then the highest summit ever climbed by mankind. The mountain had been climbed many times since then from various directions, though its southeast face remained untouched for many years.

This formidable face rises almost 2000 m above the head of the Purvi Kamet glacier and has been observed at every opportunity by parties who repeated Smythe's original route. The only known attempt on the face was by John Varco and the late Sue Nott in 2005 though they were forced to abandon their try due to bad weather.

It was in 2004 that we first tied a rope to each other in the Karakoram. We climbed a spur on the Northwest face of Spantik (7027 m) and the West face of Laila Peak (6200 m) near the Gondokoro la. Next year we climbed variations on the east ridge of Muztagh Ata (7546 m) in Xinjiang and the north face-northwest ridge of Shivling (6543 m) in Garhwal.

Naturally we thought that once we could climb the face of 6000 m peak, it will be possible for us to attempt the face of a higher mountain. We found a line in the obvious couloir that cut in the centre of the southeast face of Kamet after examining many photos. In the meantime each of us bagged two 8000 m peaks on different occasions, i.e. Manaslu and Everest for Taniguchi and Gasherbrum II and Broad Peak for Hiraide. We thought that we were ready to attempt a face at high altitude.

Acclimatisation and Reconnaissance

We established our base camp (4700 m) at the confluence of the Raikana and the Purvi Kamet glaciers on 1 September. The acclimatisation trips were made in two stages. During 4 - 7 September, we made a roundtrip to the foot of the face at 5750 m to find that avalanche danger was not as serious as in the couloir. During 10th-16th we climbed the normal route to 7200 m above Meade's Col by which we reconnoitered the route and made a cache of some foods fuel at 6600 m for our descent.

As it was difficult for us to access expensive weather forecasts regularly, we preferred to receive daily forecasts from Joshimath through our SAT phone. We learned that during that period, it would be fine on Kamet when the wind blew from the southwest in Joshimath and the bad weather would come when it blew from the north/northeast. We let the snow storms at the end of September go past, spending time at base camp. During this period, our friends on the north face of nearby Kalanka were forced to sit out storms for three days at the bivouac high on the face.

We had reduced our gear, food and fuel to the minimum. We prepared four days of food and fuel plus for some extra days, for our assault. In fact, it would take us seven days to climb the route and we never had to worry about provisions.

The southeast face of Kamet with route and bivouacs marked by Kazuya Hiraide.

The southeast face of Kamet with route and bivouacs marked by Kazuya Hiraide.



Climb to the Untouched Face

Finally the weather cleared on 25 September. We departed from base camp and plodded in deep snow on the glacier. It took us twice the time to break trail in the fresh snow which was 1m deep at Camp 1 and 1.5 m at camp 2. Fortunately we found our cache that had remained dry under the deep snow despite the the fact that the tent was half broken. We established ABC (5900 m) at the foot of the face on 28th.

We began climbing the next day under a completely blue sky. Crossing over the bergschrund, passing through the left slanting gully, we simul-climbed most of the lower section of the face and roped up at the upper snow patch. We had estimated that the route has three cruxes. Our first day ended at the base of the first crux at 6600 m as planned. It took us one and a half hour to dig out a small ledge.

Next day, on 30th, we climbed a mixed terrain of loose rock and ice. The south facing wall caught the full sunshine in the morning, which caused frequent spindrifts and falling stones. They continued even at night. We made a bivouac at 6750 m on a tiny snow ridge which felt a little bit better than the previous night.

Next day, we attempted the second crux that had been assumed in our reconnaissance to be the hardest section of the whole route. It was harder than our estimate. There continued a loose mixed terrain. We were already at 7000 m and the altitude had a detrimental influence on us. We couldn't complete the section in a day and had to make a bivouac at 7000 m halfway up the section. It was already in the midnight when we crawled into our small refuge to sleep.

We were welcomed with a clear sky after spending a short and cold night. There were only two pitches of mixed climbing to finish the second crux. The enormous third crux was lying in wait for us above two pitches of snow slopes. It was much bigger than our expectations. We decided to bivouac earlier at 7100 m to rest and prepare for the next day. We had to massage our toes which felt cold at this altitude.

On 3 October, we completed the third crux. It consisted of one pitch of rock and ice and three pitches of ice before emerging into the 'banana couloir' at 7250 m. We were intent on climbing the couloir on the next day though we couldn't reach the summit and made our sixth bivouac on the snow ridge at 7600 m. It was only 150 m to the summit.

The seventh day, on 5 October, we saw a mad red sky to the east. We were grateful to be favoured by a long spell of fine weather (eight days). We easily emerged onto the final snow slopes leading to the summit when we veered right of the ridge above our bivouac. We reached the highest point at 10:00 am. We were welcomed by a 360 degree fantastic panorama of the mountains of Garhwal Himalaya.

We descended to the cache at 6600 m that day and regained our base camp before the dawn of 8 October. Our adventure was thus complete. We left base camp two days later on 10 October. It was time to go home.

Summary :

Kamet (7756 m), Garhwal Himalaya,India. The first ascent of the direct route on the Southeast face called 'Samurai Direct' (1800 m M5+ AI5), Kazuya Hiraide and Kei Taniguchi.

11

Gangotri Col

A Possible New Passage between Kedarnath and Gangotri

Prabhat Kumar Ganguli

Garhwal is one of the most important regions of the Indian Himalaya. This small district is roughly rectangular and situated almost in the centre of the Himalayan main chain. On the western part of Garhwal lies Gangotri glacier, which is bound by the two parent rivers of Ganges - Bhagirathi on the west and Alakananda on the east. Owing to its vastness and complexity, Gangotri glacier system is also called Gangotri complex.

The Gangotri glacier flows from southeast to northwest direction and terminates at the snout known as Gaumukh from where the Bhagirathi emerges. There are seven major tributary glaciers. Maiyandi, Swachhand, Chaturangi and Raktavarna feed the main glacier from northeast while Ghanohim, Kirti and Meru merge from southwest. A maze of high peaks around the main and tributary glaciers form massive walls and thus separates the adjacent valleys from each other.

The first extensive survey of Gangotri complex under Major Osmaston was completed in 1936 which helped to rectify most of the anomalies in the old maps. The Austro-German team under Prof. Rudolf Schwarzgruber came to this complex in 1938. Equipped with the new map, they climbed half a dozen virgin peaks including Sri Kailash (6932 m).

Gangotri Col (5486 m) : Route showing Kedarnath to Gangotri

Gangotri Col (5486 m) : Route showing Kedarnath to Gangotri



Subsequently various mountaineering teams arrived in and around the Gangotri complex and climbed several other virgin peaks.

Apart from the surveys and climbing difficult peaks, ventures were also undertaken across the high formidable walls of different watersheds by mountaineers and explorers for an access and also to find short routes from one valley to another. These explorations are well documented.

The quest to explore passages through the great boundary walls of Gangotri complex, were mostly limited to the main watershed between Alakanda - Saraswati and Bhagirathi rivers. Chaturangi glacier, the longest tributary of Gangotri was by far the best option for these crossings at several places.

The 1938 Austro-German team was the first to traverse the entire length of the Gangotri glacier. Surprisingly for many years, no team tried to repeat the feat either to attempt the Chaukhamba group of peaks from the west or to gain Meade's col from the head of the glacier.

After four and a half decades, a small team from the Kolkata section of the Himalayan Club, led by Joydeep Sircar, the then local secretary, arrived at Gangotri in May 1984 with an intention of traversing the Gangotri glacier up to its head. I was a member of the team. I had also the privilege to traverse the southern slopes of the great ring wall forming the southern boundary of the Gangotri glacier two years earlier.

Barring attempts to cross the Auden's col and futile attempts made on the Meade's col, no one was interested in penetrating the long and complex southern rim of Gangotri glacier, particularly from the peaks Bharte Khunta on the west and Chaukhamba III on the east, which forms the important watershed between Gangotri and Kedarnath valleys.

On the ridge between the peak Bharte Khunta (6578 m) and Kedarnath (6940 m) there is a depression which looks like a col. Far below the col on the southern side Chorabari glacier flows, which is the main source of Mandakini - the principal river of Kedarnath and its adjacent valleys. From Chorabari, the climb to the col is extremely difficult. On the other hand, to go down vertically from the col to the

Chorabari seems impossible. Hence this col can be considered useless for regular crossings from Gangotri to Kedarnath or vice versa.

As we were hitherto unaware of any attempt to cross the high walls guarded by at least half a dozen lofty peaks, separating Gangotri valley from Kedarnath, I along with my friend Barun Ghosh (since decd.) started traversing eastward from the southern base of Kedarnath on 14 September, 1982. Although our main objective was to trace the legendary route from Kedarnath to Badrinath, I took the opportunity to keep a sharp vigil on the dividing range for probing a weakest point on the line of defense to pass from one valley to the other.

From behind the temple of Kedarnath, we climbed up 1220 m steadily to land on a snowfield strewn with boulders. Then we crossed Mahapanth khal (4620 m) - a pass on the ridge extended to the southeast from the peak Mahalaya (5892 m), a close neighbour of Kedarnath. We then traversed the crevasse ridden long Bishali glacier and climbed up to Bishali col (4755 m) on the divide between Bishali and Kaleon glacier. The stupendous rocky south faces of the peak Sumeru Parvat (6330 m) and its adjacent unnamed peak (5752 m) with the long buttresses projected towards the glacier, looked frustrating. We then crossed the small Kaleon glacier and climbed up through mixed slopes of scree and ice to gain Yeonbuk col (4850 m). The col is situated on the ridge just south of Yeonbuk (5953 m). From this high point I looked back and scanned the westerly ridge from Yeonbuk which initially passes through the unnamed peak and then rises steeply to Sumeru Parvat on the northwest. To my utter surprise, I found a clear gap between the unnamed peak and Yeonbuk. I hurried to further south to get a better view. The distance to the base of the gap from the col where I stood was hardly 400 yards and the elevation is about 300 m at an angle of maybe 60o. From the base, a couloir leads to the crest of the ridge where it is slightly depressed.

The gradient to the depression on the ridge is not very steep and the ascent to this col (5486 m) is also about 300 m. It appeared to me that it would take approximately three hours to reach to the crest from the Yeonbuk col. It was indeed temptingly close! But our objective was different. So after a photo session, we went down steeply to Mandani valley, crossed Duara khal (4176 m) and arrived at Ransi village en route to Madmaheswar in four days.

Yeonbuk col below the peak Yeonbuk and the prominent gap leading to Gangotri col.

Yeonbuk col below the peak Yeonbuk and the prominent gap leading to Gangotri col.



In 1984, our objectives were mainly to traverse the entire length of the Gangotri glacier and to reconnoitre the route to the Meade's col (after 1938) and to attempt a few peaks including Mandani. Besides I had, of course, the other objective, to probe the northern face of the great watershed for ascertaining cros